Comments on: What Won’t Meat Loaf Do?

By: Anything for love « De Ruiter Blog

Anything for love « De Ruiter Blog — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:21:41 +0000

[...] Hier een tikje wijsneuzerig artikel, maar wel verhelderend. En met een conclusie. [...]

By: Justin

Justin — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:56:20 +0000

Guess he wouldn’t support Wolverhampton Wanderers either……….Meatload is an Albion fan!! Boing, Boing!!

By: Shawn

Shawn — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:54:17 +0000

To say that somebody wouldn’t cheat to prove love isn’t correct 100% of the time. Say you fall in love with a woman who reveals she’s swinger who wants you to participate in a three way with her brother to prove your love for her. I certainly wouldn’t do that and I dare so Meatloaf wouldn’t either!

By: Paul strettoni

Paul strettoni — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:27:20 +0000

I find this astounding that all of this writing has a conclusion of Meat Loaf will do anything for love. Anything. (Within reason.)

Hoshi get a grip my friend Chuck Norris would kick meat’s ar$e now there is a conclusion for you.

Gooodnite keep it fresh… not start a page on what is to be kept fresh.
(i’ve saved u some time) Conclusion: nothing its an expression.

By: Micheal

Micheal — Fri, 16 May 2008 15:38:31 +0000

any chance you’re in law school? this sounds eerily like an analysis on a law school exam…

By: Hoshi

Hoshi — Mon, 12 May 2008 04:27:17 +0000

The POINT, if you read the article is that grammatically, the song isn’t right. WHY would anyone FORGET the way you feel … FOR LOVE. Would you cheat because you love someone? NO, you WON’T cheat because of love. The point is because of a BUT (I would do anything for love BUT I won’t do that) it it causes people to question the song and caused this whole mess.

I mean, I’ll do anything for love BUT I won’t cheat…. This makes NO sense in the English language.
Either AND or LIKE are more appropriate.

SEE the point now?